Equivalence Relations
Equivalence Relations: Overview
This topic covers concepts, such as, Reflexive Relation on Sets, Symmetric Relation on Sets, Transitive Relation on Sets, Equivalence Relation on Sets & Anti-symmetric Relation on Sets etc.
Important Questions on Equivalence Relations
The relation can be defined in the set as .It is an example of

Let and : or be a relation on . Then the minimum number of elements, that must be added to the relation so that it becomes reflexive and symmetric, is

The number of relations, on the set containing and which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is _________.

Let . Then the relation is

The relation defined in as is divisible by is

A relation is defined on set of real numbers.
{ and is an irrational} then is

Let be the relation on the set of all real numbers defined by if . Then is

Let and the relation be defined on as follows:
.
Then, write minimum number of ordered pairs to be added in to make reflexive and transitive.

The relation in the set given by is even}, is

Assume and are (non-empty) relations in a set . Which of the following relation given below is false


Let be a set of non-singular matrices and be a relation defined on set such that is inverse of then is

Let be a set and be a relation on set . Then is

The relation defined on the set of natural numbers given by is

Let Z denote the set of all integers. If a relation R is defined on Z as follows:
( x, y) R if and only if x is multiple of y, then R is

Let represent the set of natural numbers, and a relation in the set of natural numbers be defined as . is a relation. (Choose the option that fits the blank)

A relation is defined in the set of real numbers as , if . Then this relation is

Relation defined on set of all real numbers by is

Consider the following relation on the set of real square matrices of order ,
STATEMENT-1: Relation is equivalence.
STATEMENT-2: Relation is symmetric.
Which of the following is correct.

A relation is defined as for , where is the set of all integers. Then the relation is:
